Transformation And Strategic Shift In Pakistan–United States Relations: Implications For Public Policy And Governance

Authors

  • Sana Majeed MPhil Scholar, Department of Political Science, University of Lakki Marwat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
  • Dr. Waseem Ullah Head of the Department & Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Lakki Marwat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Keywords:

Pakistan–US Relations; Strategic Realignment; Afghanistan; Counterterrorism; Geo-Economics; Constructivism; Neoclassical Realism

Abstract

Pakistan–United States relations have moved through repeated cycles of security alignment, disagreement and selective re-engagement. This article analyses the transformation of the relationship from Cold War military alliances to a more limited, issue-based partnership after the United States withdrew from Afghanistan in 2021. Drawing on its historical and conceptual discussion, the study employs qualitative documentary analysis and a comparative reading of policy periods. Constructivism explains how perceptions of loyalty, sovereignty and threat shape the relationship; neoclassical realism shows how regional power shifts and domestic constraints influence policy choices. The analysis finds that diverging threat perceptions, the legacy of counterterrorism, U.S.–India cooperation, Pakistan–China ties, and domestic economic pressures complicate strategic alignment. At the same time, counterterrorism coordination, trade, energy, climate adaptation, education and digital governance offer practical channels for cooperation. The article argues that neither an unrestricted alliance nor a complete diplomatic rupture is likely to meet both countries’ interests. A durable relationship requires realistic expectations, civilian-led economic engagement, clear security boundaries and continuous diplomatic dialogue.

 

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

Sana Majeed, & Dr. Waseem Ullah. (2026). Transformation And Strategic Shift In Pakistan–United States Relations: Implications For Public Policy And Governance. Dialogue Social Science Review (DSSR), 4(3), 1573–1582. Retrieved from https://dialoguesreview.com/index.php/2/article/view/1896

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.