“A Comparative analysis of “Death Penalty’’ in Modern Criminal Law and Islamic Law

Abstract

This article contrasts how the death penalty is treated in contemporary criminal law. It examines the justifications for or objections to the use of the death penalty, its implementation, and the ethical considerations involved. Changes in social attitudes and international human rights principles have a significant impact on contemporary criminal law. Due to the fact that wrongful executions cannot be reversed, many nations view the death penalty as excessively harsh or risky. As a consequence of this, a number of nations have either completely outlawed it or only allow it for the most serious offenses, subject to stringent procedures and numerous legal safeguards. The death penalty is allowed for some serious crimes under Islamic law, which is based on the Quran, Hadith, and traditional legal theories. Murder, abandoning one's faith, and disparaging one's religion are among these. But Islamic law also places a lot of emphasis on fairness, justice, and protecting innocent lives. Sentences can only be given with solid evidence and reliable witness, and in some cases, the victim's family can choose to forgive the offender in return for compensation. This article explains how the two systems determine which crimes are eligible for execution, how sentences are handed down by courts, and the safeguards in place to prevent wrongful punishment. It also examines the moral debate. Whether or not the death penalty actually achieves justice and upholds human dignity. This article compares these two approaches to demonstrate how society, religion, and the law influence opinions regarding the death penalty